top of page

Early Voting and Election Integrity

Updated: Sep 22, 2023


Celebration of Democracy
Fair and Honest Elections in America

Early voting and election integrity


are topics that have been at the forefront of discussions around democratic governance, especially in the context of the United States but also globally. Both are connected to how elections are administered and how trust is built in the democratic process.

Early Voting

Early voting allows eligible voters to cast their ballots for a scheduled election during a period prior to the official Election Day. This system is designed to increase accessibility and convenience, providing more opportunities for voters who might not be able to vote on Election Day due to work commitments, health issues, or other logistical constraints.

Pros:

  • Increases voter turnout by making voting more convenient.

  • Allows for corrections in case of mistakes or misunderstandings, as officials have more time to address these issues.

  • Can reduce the burden on Election Day resources and staff.

Cons:

  • Can be more costly to administer.

  • Some argue that voters may make uninformed decisions if voting too early, without access to late-stage information.

Election Integrity

Election integrity refers to the practice of conducting elections in a manner that is transparent, free, and fair. It ensures that:

  • All eligible voters are able to vote.

  • Votes are counted accurately.

  • The process is transparent and accountable.

Measures to Ensure Integrity:

  • Voter identification requirements.

  • Paper ballot backups for electronic voting systems.

  • Post-election audits.

  • Transparent and non-partisan administration.

Challenges:

  • Claims of voter fraud

  • Political control of one party

  • Voter suppression tactics.

  • Concerns over mail-in ballot security.

  • Disinformation campaigns that aim to erode trust in the electoral process.

Intersection of Early Voting and Election Integrity


The expansion of early voting is often debated in the context of election integrity. While early voting can make it easier for people to vote, critics argue that the extended voting period could create opportunities for fraud or administrative errors.


Boards of elections at the state and local levels are responsible for implementing measures that facilitate both early voting and the integrity of the electoral process. This often involves a combination of physical security (e.g., secure storage of early ballots), technological solutions (e.g., secure and auditable voting machines), and procedural safeguards (e.g., verification of voter identity, chain of custody for ballots).


To maintain public trust, it's essential for these bodies to operate transparently and for any changes in voting procedures to be communicated clearly to the public. Robust, independent auditing and oversight are also key elements in ensuring that both early voting and election integrity are upheld.


Early voting and election integrity are not mutually exclusive; rather, they can and should be designed to complement each other to facilitate a more accessible, secure, and trusted electoral process. However, when one political party is predominant the chances for election fraud and voter fraud increase.


5 views0 comments
bottom of page