top of page

Government Regulation of Election Integrity Act of 2021 Pros and Cons


American Democracy

The Election Integrity Act of 2021 Pros and Cons


The Election Integrity Act of 2021, as well as other similarly named legislation, can refer to a variety of bills proposed in different states in the United States, each with its own distinct provisions and impacts. These bills have sparked extensive debates, with proponents arguing they are essential for maintaining the integrity of elections, and critics contending they can lead to voter suppression. Pros of Election Integrity Acts:


Pros of the Election Integrity Act of 2021:

Preventing Fraud:

  • Many proponents argue that stringent voting laws are necessary to prevent fraud and ensure that only eligible voters are casting ballots.

  • Voter ID requirements are meant to ensure that voters are who they claim to be.

Public Confidence:

  • Proponents believe that such acts can bolster public confidence in the election process by reducing the risk of illegal voting and election fraud.



Accurate Voter Rolls:

  • Regular maintenance and updating of voter rolls can help in maintaining accurate voter lists, removing deceased individuals, and those who have moved to other jurisdictions.


Standardization:


These laws can provide standard procedures for election officials to follow, thereby reducing inconsistencies and errors in the voting process.



Cons of Election Integrity Acts:

Voter Suppression:

  • Critics argue that many provisions in these acts can lead to voter suppression by making it harder for certain groups, particularly minorities and low-income individuals, to vote.


Barriers to Voting:

  • Stringent voter ID requirements, reductions in early voting, and restrictions on mail-in voting can create barriers for voters, especially for those who lack proper identification or have limited access to transportation and time off work.


Disenfranchisement:

  • Changes to voter roll maintenance procedures can lead to eligible voters being wrongly purged from voter lists, thus preventing them from voting.


Impact on Voter Turnout:

  • Restrictions can negatively impact voter turnout, with some people being deterred from voting due to additional requirements or perceived difficulties in voting.


Partisan Motivations:

  • Critics have argued that some of these acts are motivated more by partisan interests than by genuine concerns about election integrity.



Cost and Resource Intensive:

  • Implementing new requirements and regulations can be resource-intensive and costly for both election officials and voters.


Conclusion:

Election integrity is crucial for the functioning of a democracy, and legislation that genuinely aims to secure elections and instill public confidence is important.


However, striking a balance is essential to ensure that such laws do not inadvertently disenfranchise eligible voters or create unnecessary barriers to voting. A fair and equitable approach that maintains election integrity while ensuring access to voting is crucial for maintaining public trust in the democratic process.

Different viewpoints exist, and the potential pros and cons listed above may vary depending on the specific provisions in each act and how they are implemented in practice. In recent elections the State of Georgia offered proof of the effectiveness of voter id with significant greater voter turnout.


2 views0 comments
bottom of page