top of page

Ranked Choice Voting Pros and Cons

Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), instant-runoff voting, or preferential voting, is an electoral system where voters rank candidates in order of preference. Instead of selecting a single candidate, voters can express their preferences for multiple candidates. RCV has been implemented in some jurisdictions and has advantages and disadvantages, potentially impacting election integrity. Here are the pros and cons of Ranked Choice Voting and their effects on election integrity:

Ranked Choice Voting Pros and Cons:


  1. Majority Representation: RCV promotes majority support for elected candidates. With the elimination of runoff elections, RCV ensures that the winning candidate has broad-based support and is preferred by most voters, as it considers voters' preferences beyond their first choice.

  2. Increased Voter Choice: RCV allows voters to express their preferences for multiple candidates. This provides voters with more options and encourages a diverse range of candidates to participate in the electoral process. It allows voters to vote for their preferred candidate without worrying about strategic voting or the "spoiler effect."

  3. Reduced Negative Campaigning: In RCV systems, candidates are incentivized to reach a broader base of voters beyond their core supporters. Negative campaigning can be detrimental in such systems because candidates need to appeal to voters who may have ranked their opponents as their second or third choice. This can foster a more positive and issue-based campaign environment.

  4. Cost Savings: RCV eliminates the need for separate runoff elections, resulting in cost savings for jurisdictions. It streamlines the election process and reduces the financial burden of conducting multiple elections.

Cons of Ranked Choice Voting:

  1. Complexity and Voter Education: RCV introduces a more complex voting process than the traditional "first-past-the-post" system. Some voters may find ranking candidates confusing or not fully understand how their votes will be counted. Voter education and outreach are crucial to ensure voters understand the RCV system, which can require additional resources and time.

  2. Potential for Invalid or Exhausted Ballots: In RCV, if a voter does not rank all candidates or does not understand the ranking process, their ballot may become invalid or exhausted. An exhausted ballot occurs when a voter's preferences are eliminated from the count because their preferred candidates have already been eliminated. This can reduce the overall impact of voters' preferences and potentially lead to less expected outcomes.

  3. Longer Counting Process: RCV requires a more intricate vote-counting process, which can take longer than traditional systems. The counting process can involve multiple rounds of redistributing votes, eliminating candidates, and transferring preferences, which may delay the final results. This could potentially undermine public trust if there are delays or concerns about the count's accuracy.

Effects on Election Integrity:

Ranked Choice Voting has the potential to enhance election integrity in several ways:

  1. Stronger Mandate for Elected Candidates: RCV promotes the election of candidates who support the majority of voters, thereby increasing the legitimacy and mandate of the elected officials.

  2. Reduced Tactical Voting: RCV mitigates strategic voting by allowing voters to express their valid preferences without fear of wasting their vote or causing a "spoiler effect." This can lead to a more accurate representation of voter intent and reduce the incentives for strategically manipulating the electoral process.

  3. Discouragement of Negative Campaigning: RCV incentivizes candidates to reach out to a broader range of voters, reducing the reliance on negative campaigning tactics that undermine election integrity.

However, it is essential to address the potential challenges and drawbacks of RCV, such as the complexity of the voting process and the need for voter education. Ensuring voters understand the system and that the counting process is transparent and accurate is crucial to maintaining election integrity when implementing Ranked Choice Voting.

10 views0 comments


bottom of page